Arbitral Tribunal’s Findings Based on Plausible Contractual Interpretation Should Stand Unless Tainted by Patent Illegality or Jurisdictional Error: Calcutta High Court

Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Based on Plausible Contractual Interpretation Should Stand Unless Tainted by Patent Illegality or Jurisdictional Error: Calcutta High…

Continue ReadingArbitral Tribunal’s Findings Based on Plausible Contractual Interpretation Should Stand Unless Tainted by Patent Illegality or Jurisdictional Error: Calcutta High Court

High Court Appointing Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) Is Not A “Court” Under Section 42; Jurisdiction For Section 34 Challenges Lies With The Principal Civil Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court

High Court Appointing Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) Is Not A "Court" Under Section 42; Jurisdiction For Section 34 Challenges Lies…

Continue ReadingHigh Court Appointing Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) Is Not A “Court” Under Section 42; Jurisdiction For Section 34 Challenges Lies With The Principal Civil Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court

High Court’s Interference Under Article 226/227 In Matters Pertaining To Arbitration Limited To Cases Of Clear Perversity: Supreme Court

High Court's Interference Under Article 226/227 In Matters Pertaining To Arbitration Limited To Cases Of Clear Perversity: Supreme Court Download

Continue ReadingHigh Court’s Interference Under Article 226/227 In Matters Pertaining To Arbitration Limited To Cases Of Clear Perversity: Supreme Court

Claim Of Non-Receipt Of A Signed Arbitral Award Cannot Be Introduced For The First Time In An Appeal Under Section 37 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act: Gujarat High Court

Claim Of Non-Receipt Of A Signed Arbitral Award Cannot Be Introduced For The First Time In An Appeal Under Section…

Continue ReadingClaim Of Non-Receipt Of A Signed Arbitral Award Cannot Be Introduced For The First Time In An Appeal Under Section 37 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act: Gujarat High Court