Once The Arbitral Mandate Expires Under Section 29A Of The Arbitration Act Courts Must Order Substitution

The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.

There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;

None of the information contained on the website is in the nature of a legal opinion or otherwise amounts to any legal advice.

Latest Article

Unsuccessful Party In Arbitration Can Invoke Section 9 At Post Award Stage Supreme Court

Use Of The Word Can In A Dispute Resolution Clause Does Not Create A Binding Arbitration Agreement

Where Parties Choose The Seat Before The First Application Is Filed Section 42 Cannot Confer Jurisdiction On Another Court

Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus For Time-Bound Disposal Of Statutory Arbitration Not Maintainable

Once The Arbitral Mandate Expires Under Section 29A Of The Arbitration Act Courts Must Order Substitution

Latest Article

Once The Arbitral Mandate Expires Under Section 29A Of The Arbitration Act Courts Must Order Substitution

You Might Also Like

Disclaimer & Confirmation