Skip to content

Latest Article

General Reference To Tender Documents In A Letter Of Intent Does Not Incorporate An Arbitration Clause

June 29, 2026

Grant Of Ad-Hoc Escalation Damages Without Pleadings Or Proof Is Patently Illegal

June 29, 2026

High Court While Substituting An Arbitrator Under Section 15 Cannot Declare Prior Arbitral Proceedings A Nullity

June 29, 2026

Legal Representatives Must Challenge An Arbitral Award Under Section 34 And Not Under Article 227 Supreme Court

June 29, 2026
Linkedin Huge-mail-01 Phone-alt
  • Home
  • Counsels
  • Practice Areas
  • Articles & Publications
  • Knowledge Series
  • Blog
Menu Close
  • Home
  • Counsels
  • Practice Areas
  • Articles & Publications
  • Knowledge Series
  • Blog

Articles & Publications

  1. Home>
  2. Articles & Publications>
  3. Page 6
  • Articles-and-Publications
  • Business Line
  • JUS MUNDI
  • Live Law
  • Mondaq
  • SCC Online - Expert Corner

Appointment of Arbitrator by High Court

•
October 12, 2025

Appeals-in-Commercial-Matters

•
October 12, 2025

Administrative Delay No Ground

•
October 12, 2025

Jus Mundi – Confidentiality Takes Primacy

•
October 6, 2025

Jus Mundi – Judicial Modification of Arbitral Awards

•
October 6, 2025

SCC Online Expert Article – Consent in Arbitration Agreement

•
September 30, 2025

No Retrospective Challenges to Unilateral Appointments After Active Participation in Arbitral Proceedings: Delhi High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award, Reinforces Narrow Scope of Judicial Review Under Sections 34 and 37

•
September 7, 2025

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitration Agreement Using Business Efficacy Test

•
September 7, 2025

No Limitation Bar For Perpetual Injunction Decrees; Each Violation A Fresh Cause Of Action: Supreme Court Of India

•
September 7, 2025

No Special Relaxation For Government And Its Enterprises In Furnishing Security To Challenge Arbitral Awards: Calcutta High Court

•
September 7, 2025

No Prescribed Format for Arbitral Awards; Substance Triumphs Over Form: Madras High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Time Runs Against DMRC: Delhi High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award for Being Time-Barred

•
September 7, 2025

Calcutta High Court Declines Appointment Of Arbitrator Under Section 11 Of The Arbitration Act And Reaffirms That Ex-Facie Time-Barred Claims Cannot Be Revived

•
September 7, 2025

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Signatures from All Arbitrators Constituting the Arbitral Tribunal

•
September 7, 2025

MSMED Act Will Prevail Over Arbitration Act In Disputes Involving MSMEs: Delhi High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Presumption Of Validity And Separability: Delhi High Court Affirms Continuity Of Arbitration Clauses Upon Lease Renewal

•
September 7, 2025

One-Sided Forfeiture Clauses in Apartment Buyer Agreements: An Unfair Trade Practice, Rules Supreme Court

•
September 7, 2025

Supreme Court Clarifies Threshold For Corruption Prosecution: Mere Policy Violations Or Administrative Irregularities Causing Loss To Exchequer Insufficient Without Proof Of Bribery

•
September 7, 2025

Chhattisgarh High Court Reiterates That Additional Evidence In Section 34 Arbitration Challenges Can Only Be Introduced In Exceptional Circumstances

•
September 7, 2025
« Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 11 Next »
  • +91 9873122974
  • info@trinitychambers.in
  • 28 SFS Flats, Neeti Bagh, Khel Gaon Marg, New Delhi - 110049
  • Home
  • Counsels
  • Practice Areas
  • Blogs
Copyright ©2025. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:

  • The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use;

  • The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.

  • There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;

  • None of the information contained on the website is in the nature of a legal opinion or otherwise amounts to any legal advice.

The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. Trinity Chambers and its members will not be liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.

I AGREE