Skip to content

Latest Article

Notice Invoking Arbitration After 21 Years Cannot Revive A Hopelessly TimeBarred Claim

June 29, 2026

Once The Arbitral Mandate Expires Under Section 29A Of The Arbitration Act Courts Must Order Substitution

June 29, 2026

Cryptocurrencies Constitute Property Under Indian Law Madras High Court

June 29, 2026

A Fresh Section 11 Petition Is Not Maintainable

June 29, 2026
Linkedin Huge-mail-01 Phone-alt
  • Home
  • Counsels
  • Practice Areas
  • Articles & Publications
  • Knowledge Series
  • Blog
Menu Close
  • Home
  • Counsels
  • Practice Areas
  • Articles & Publications
  • Knowledge Series
  • Blog

Articles & Publications

  1. Home>
  2. Articles & Publications>
  3. Page 7
  • Articles-and-Publications
  • Business Line
  • JUS MUNDI
  • Live Law
  • Mondaq
  • SCC Online - Expert Corner

Kerala High Court Rules That Contractually Imposed Time Limits For Invoking Arbitration In Deviation of the Limitation Act Are Void

•
September 7, 2025

Delhi High Court Reaffirms That Writ Petitions Cannot Be Used To Challenge Arbitral Awards Under MSMED Act

•
September 7, 2025

Disputes Involving the Partnership Act and Partnership Deed Affecting Third-Party Rights Not Arbitrable: Madhya Pradesh High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Request For Appointment Of Independent Arbitrator In Absence Of Any Evident Bias

•
September 7, 2025

Delhi High Court Dismisses Challenge Against Arbitral Award For Failure To Raise Timely Objections On Quality Of Goods And Lack Of Evidence For Counterclaims

•
September 7, 2025

Limitation for Arbitrator’s Appointment Begins from Failure to Act on Arbitration Notice: Andhra Pradesh High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Interference At The Referral Stage In Section 11 Proceedings Under The Arbitration Act Permissible Only When The Claims Are Manifestly Time Barred: Calcutta High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Strict Timelines In Arbitration: Supreme Court Calls For Legislative Reconsideration On Limitation Periods

•
September 7, 2025

Arbitral Tribunal’s Findings Based on Plausible Contractual Interpretation Should Stand Unless Tainted by Patent Illegality or Jurisdictional Error: Calcutta High Court

•
September 7, 2025

High Court Appointing Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) Is Not A “Court” Under Section 42; Jurisdiction For Section 34 Challenges Lies With The Principal Civil Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Unilateral Appointment of Sole Arbitrator: Kerala High Court Reaffirms Its Invalidity

•
September 7, 2025

High Court’s Interference Under Article 226/227 In Matters Pertaining To Arbitration Limited To Cases Of Clear Perversity: Supreme Court

•
September 7, 2025

Delhi High Court Reiterates That Timelines For Putting Up A Challenge Under Section 34 Of The Arbitration Act Are Sacrosanct

•
September 7, 2025

Supreme Court Sets Aside Fraudulent Arbitration Awards Rendered In Unilaterally Conducted Arbitral Proceedings

•
September 7, 2025

Failure to Enclose the Contested Arbitral Award with a Section 34 Petition Renders the Filing Void: Delhi High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Claim Of Non-Receipt Of A Signed Arbitral Award Cannot Be Introduced For The First Time In An Appeal Under Section 37 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act: Gujarat High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Calcutta High Court Upholds Maintainability Of Commercial Suit On Grounds Of Urgency Of The Reliefs

•
September 7, 2025

Dispute Resolution or Procedural Labyrinth? Revisiting the NHAI Conciliation Mechanism

•
September 7, 2025

Failure to Consider Contractual Amendment Justifies Setting Aside of an Arbitral Award: Delhi High Court

•
September 7, 2025

Scope of Section 11 of the Arbitration Act: Referral Courts Must Limit Enquiry to Existence of Arbitration Agreement Holds Delhi High Court – Copy

•
September 7, 2025
« Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 11 Next »
  • +91 9873122974
  • info@trinitychambers.in
  • 28 SFS Flats, Neeti Bagh, Khel Gaon Marg, New Delhi - 110049
  • Home
  • Counsels
  • Practice Areas
  • Blogs
Copyright ©2025. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges the following:

  • The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use;

  • The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.

  • There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;

  • None of the information contained on the website is in the nature of a legal opinion or otherwise amounts to any legal advice.

The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. Trinity Chambers and its members will not be liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.

I AGREE